Skip to content

Interconnection queue guide · PJM

PJM interconnection queue

How the reformed cycle process works, what the first cycle received, and what the public queue record shows at individual points of interconnection.

GridVision AI ResearchPublished Updated

PJM at a glance

Process
A cycle-based, first-ready, first-served process that replaced first-come, first-served.
Cycle 1 application deadline
April 27, 2026.
Cycle 1 requests
811 projects and 220 GW of nameplate capacity.
Largest resource types in Cycle 1
Natural gas 105.8 GW (157 projects); storage 66.5 GW (349); nuclear 17.9 GW (27); solar 14.8 GW (142).
Expected study duration
One to two years, depending on the impact of an individual project.
Transition backlog
In September 2025, PJM said the remaining transition backlog of about 46 GW would be processed by the end of 2026.

Sources: PJM Inside Lines, “Over 800 New Generation Projects Seek To Connect Under PJM’s Reformed Process,” April 29, 2026; PJM Inside Lines, “PJM Completes Interconnection Reform Transition Cycle 1 Studies,” September 22, 2025.

Facts checked September 16, 2026.

How the PJM process works

PJM studies new service requests in cycles. Each cycle moves through the same sequence:

  1. 01ApplicationSubmit the application, study deposit, readiness deposit and site-control evidence by the cycle deadline.
  2. 02Application reviewPJM checks each application for completeness.
  3. 03Phase 1, then Decision Point 1
  4. 04Phase 2, then Decision Point 2
  5. 05Phase 3, then Decision Point 3
  6. 06Final agreement

At each decision point, the project owner decides whether to continue into the next phase. Deposit and withdrawal terms are set by PJM's tariff and Manual 14H, which govern any live project.

Sources: PJM, “Cycle 01 Application Requirements and NextGen Process,” Interconnection Process Subcommittee, January 2026; PJM Manual 14H: New Service Requests Cycle Process.

What a PJM Cycle 1 application required

PJM's January 2026 presentation to its Interconnection Process Subcommittee listed these Cycle 1 application requirements:

Study deposit
One deposit for the whole cycle, from $75,000 (0–20 MW) to $400,000 (over 750 MW). 10% is non-refundable, and the developer pays the full study cost.
Readiness deposit
$4,000 per MW of the larger of the energy and capacity values, by letter of credit or wire transfer.
Site control
100% of the generating facility, including the high side of the main power transformer, valid for one year from the application deadline. Minimum acreage: solar 5 acres/MW, wind 30 acres/MW, battery 1 acre per 100 MWh.
Agreements and data
An executed Application and Studies Agreement, with technical data entered in PJM's NextGen platform.

Sources: PJM, “Cycle 01 Application Requirements and NextGen Process,” Interconnection Process Subcommittee, January 2026.

What the public record shows at PJM points of interconnection

Across the 26 PJM points of interconnection GridVision has published so far, the Berkeley Lab dataset records 148 interconnection requests filed between 1997 and 2025.

Outcomes of interconnection requests at the published PJM points of interconnection
OutcomeRequestsCapacity (MW)
Reached commercial operation624,589
Withdrew7822,027
Still active8637
Total14827,253

For the requests that were built, the median time from request to commercial operation was 3.0 years. For those that withdrew, the median time from request to withdrawal was 2.2 years.

These 26 nodes are not a random sample of PJM, and a pattern at one point of interconnection does not transfer to another. The dataset records what happened, not why.

Published PJM point-of-interconnection retrospectives
Point of interconnectionStateRequestsBuiltWithdrawnActive
Jay 138 kVIndiana8125
Keystone 345 kVIndiana5230
Olive-Dequine 345 kVIndiana7340
Calvert Cliffs 500 kVMaryland5320
Dickerson 230 kVMaryland6240
Burlington 26 kVNew Jersey7340
Deptford 13 kVNew Jersey5140
Essex 230 kVNew Jersey8350
Huron 69 kVNew Jersey5230
KearnyNew Jersey5410
Linden 230 kVNew Jersey7232
Mickleton 230 kVNew Jersey6240
Red Oak 230 kVNew Jersey5140
SussexNew Jersey5140
Ahoskie 34.5 kVNorth Carolina5131
Buckskin 69 kVOhio6150
Tait 69 kVOhio5410
Hatfield 500 kVPennsylvania6330
South Bend 500 kVPennsylvania6330
EdgemoorPennsylvania / Delaware5230
Axton 138 kVVirginia5140
Four Rivers 230 kVVirginia5320
Hopewell 230 kVVirginia6330
Hopewell-Surry 230 kVVirginia5320
North Anna 500 kVVirginia5410
Oak HallVirginia5410

Questions to answer before advancing a PJM queue position

  • Which study results does your cost allocation rest on, and which of them depend on requests that could still withdraw?
  • Which network upgrades are shared with other requests, and what happens to your share if those requests leave?
  • Under the current tariff, what is at risk if you continue, and what is forfeited if you withdraw now?
  • Which unknowns could change the answer, who owns each one, and when will it be resolved?

Weighing whether to advance a PJM queue position?

Bring the decision, and get back a management-ready decision record: what is verified, what is assumed, what is still unknown, and what to do next.

Bring One Live Decision

Sources

Facts checked September 16, 2026. Process rules and queue data change; the governing tariff, manuals and study documents control any live project.