The interconnection decision platform for developers.

Explore the national interconnection queue, compare candidate sites and queue positions across every major U.S. ISO, and get an explainable recommendation you can defend to your investment committee.

Request a demo Apply to the Design Partner Program

Interconnection is the bottleneck

Interconnection is where renewable, storage, and data-center projects are won or lost — and it's the part developers have the least visibility into.

The data is fragmented. Every ISO publishes its queue differently, in its own format, on its own cadence. Teams stitch together spreadsheets, GIS layers, ISO portals, and consultant studies just to form a view — and that view is stale the moment it's assembled.

The timelines are long. Studies and queue positions play out over years, and the assumptions behind a siting decision are rarely re-examined once the capital is committed.

The mistakes are expensive. An upgrade-cost surprise, a multi-year delay, or a withdrawn position can sink a project's economics — and these surprises usually land after a site has already been chosen.

The result is capital-allocation uncertainty. Multi-million-dollar siting bets get made on incomplete, uncalibrated information, and the reasoning is hard to reconstruct when an investment committee, lender, or partner asks how the decision was reached.

Fragmented data, turned into a defensible decision

GridVision AI unifies the national interconnection queue into one view (National Interconnection Intelligence), lets you ask questions in plain English (AI Copilot), compares your candidate options side by side (Scenario Analysis), and returns a board-ready Executive Decision Report — with a Trust Layer that shows the confidence, evidence, citations, and assumptions behind every number.

It's built for developers, not utility operators. You work in the language of sites, queue positions, cost, timeline, and confidence — not one-line diagrams or control-room telemetry.

How it works

1
Explore the national queue
See interconnection activity across every major U.S. ISO in one place, filtered to the region and technology you care about.
2
Compare candidate options
Ask the Copilot — or run Scenario Analysis directly — to put your candidate sites or queue positions side by side on capacity, timeline, cost, risk, and confidence.
3
Receive an explainable recommendation
Get an Executive Decision Report that names a recommended option and shows the evidence and assumptions behind it.

Core capabilities

National Queue Explorer

A unified, filterable view of the U.S. interconnection queue across PJM, MISO, CAISO, NYISO, ISO-NE, SPP, and ERCOT, with a live active-capacity headline.

Business value: One place to understand the competitive landscape for interconnection — no more reconciling seven ISO formats by hand.

AI Copilot

Ask about the queue or a siting decision in plain English; the Copilot plans and runs the right analysis for you and streams back an answer.

Business value: Your team gets to an informed view in minutes, without an electrical-engineering background or weeks of manual work.

Scenario Analysis

Compare candidate sites and queue positions on the dimensions that drive a decision — capacity, timeline, cost, risk, and confidence. The comparison is deterministic and runs without a language model.

Business value: Replace gut-feel side-by-sides with a consistent, repeatable comparison you can stand behind.

Executive Decision Report

A board-ready output for any comparison: Executive Summary, Recommendation, an Alternatives Comparison Table, and Risks.

Business value: Hand your investment committee, lenders, and partners a decision document — not a raw data export.

Trust Layer

Every recommendation carries a confidence indicator, supporting evidence, citations to the analysis behind each figure, stated assumptions, and honest warnings when data is limited.

Business value: Decisions you can defend in diligence — explainable, traceable, and transparent about what is and isn't known.

Who it's for

Renewable developers

Screen sites and queue positions before you commit study spend, and compare candidates across ISOs on a consistent basis.

Storage developers

Find where interconnection capacity and timeline actually favor your project, and compare positions side by side.

Data center developers

Evaluate where large loads can realistically interconnect, and bring a defensible view of cost and timing into site selection.

Infrastructure investors

Pressure-test the interconnection thesis behind a project or portfolio — the murkiest part of renewable, storage, and data-center diligence — with evidence and stated confidence.

Why GridVision

We believe an interconnection decision should be as defensible as the capital behind it.

That means recommendations you can open up and inspect: the evidence is shown, the assumptions are stated, confidence is expressed honestly, and every figure traces back to the analysis that produced it. When the data doesn't support a conclusion, the platform says so rather than guessing.

The goal isn't to replace your team's judgment — it's to give that judgment better, faster, and more transparent inputs, so the reasoning behind a siting decision is clear long after it's made.

Design Partner Program

We're working closely with a small number of developers as design partners.

Who should apply

Renewable, storage, or data-center developers with an active interconnection pipeline concentrated in one ISO, and a history of completed projects. The best-fit partners have a recent, specific interconnection experience worth improving and can share historical project outcomes.

What partners receive

Hands-on onboarding, a named product contact, direct influence over the roadmap, and a private engagement in which we work to prove a calibrated prediction on your own historical data — in shadow, changing nothing in your process until you decide.

What we ask in return

A sponsor and a data owner, access to historical outcomes for one ISO and project type, and candid feedback as we go. It's a collaboration: your workflows and your data shape what the platform becomes.

Become a design partner

Frequently asked questions

What can we see working today, before sharing any data?: The National Queue Explorer, the Copilot, and Scenario Analysis producing an Executive Decision Report with a Trust panel — all on demonstration data. Scenario Analysis is deterministic and needs no language model.
Does the AI invent the numbers?: No. The comparison metrics are computed by the analysis engines and are deterministic; the Copilot narrates them. Confidence is never fabricated — when the data is thin, the platform says so and surfaces a warning.
Is this a utility operations or grid-control tool?: No. GridVision is a decision and screening platform for developers — it helps you evaluate and defend interconnection options. It is not SCADA, substation-planning, or grid-control software, and it does not replace a formal interconnection study.
What do you need from a design partner?: Historical outcomes (cost and in-service dates) for one ISO and project type, and whether you followed past recommendations. Your raw data stays yours; it never crosses tenants.
Who owns our data?: You do. Your raw data remains yours and is deletable and exportable on request. Derived, aggregate models are ours, and raw data never crosses between customers.
How is our data handled?: Access is tenant-scoped, encrypted in transit and at rest, and governed by a DPA with disclosed sub-processors. Pilot data is scoped to the agreed ISO and project type.

Bring us a real decision

Tell us about a project you're siting or a queue position you're weighing, and we'll show you the Executive Decision Report on a case like yours.