Queue Explorer
Search represented projects and locations across the national interface and open a project detail page.
Covers represented sources only; coverage is not universal across ISO/RTO markets.
PJM interconnection decision sprint
Before the next PJM study commitment, know which POI is worth pursuing.
One project. One POI. One cited go / review / stop memo in 10 business days.
GridVision organizes the project, queue, site, and authorized network evidence behind one live management decision. Missing evidence stays visible; formal PJM and engineering studies remain authoritative.
Compare two cost-document versions · $2,500–$3,500 →The executive problem
The hard question is not finding the data. It is deciding where engineering time and development capital should go.
Queue, market, site, and project evidence arrive fragmented and in different states of certainty. Management still has to commit the next study dollar. GridVision turns that evidence into a decision-ready recommendation with its basis attached.
Today that evidence sits in
- ISO records and project histories
- Consultant and analyst workstreams
- Engineering and development assumptions
- Portfolio spreadsheets and committee materials
Point of view
GridVision helps energy developers decide where to invest, what to advance, and when to walk away.
A decision system, not a data aggregator. The queue is not merely a filing problem—it is a capital-allocation problem, and every position must keep earning its next commitment.
- Public and authorized evidence
- Analysis is bound to project, market, and queue evidence the team is authorized to use.
- Deterministic analysis
- Screening is rule-based and repeatable, not a generative guess about the network.
- Transparent provenance
- Source, as-of time, fetch time, and dataset or model version are retained where present.
- Explicit unknowns
- Verified evidence, user inputs, assumptions, and missing data stay separately labelled.
- Executive-ready recommendation
- The output is a decision structured for management review, with its evidence attached.
Market reality
Most capacity that enters an interconnection queue never gets built.
Published industry research, not GridVision results. These figures describe the market developers are deciding in.
13%
of capacity that requested interconnection between 2000 and 2020 had reached commercial operation by the end of 2025
75%
of that same capacity was withdrawn from the queue
~2,060 GW
of generation and storage was still actively seeking interconnection at the end of 2025
5+ years
median time from interconnection request to commercial operation, for projects built in 2025
Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up: 2026 Edition. Data as of year-end 2025; published June 2026.
Six ISO markets represented
PJM, MISO, CAISO, NYISO, ISO-NE, SPP. Represented sources — coverage is not universal across ISO/RTO markets.
Read the public record for eachThree evidence-gated verdicts
PURSUE, REVIEW, DEPRIORITIZE express relative development priority, not an investment decision.
N/A rather than a guess
A missing source field is shown as N/A and never replaced with sample or inferred data.
How GridVision works
Fragmented evidence becomes one accountable recommendation.
- 0.1
Intake
Define the project, market, POI, decision owner, and evidence cut-off in a structured intake. No input is guessed.
- 0.2
Evidence
Bind the analysis to authorized project, queue, and network evidence. Gaps are recorded rather than filled.
- 0.3
Engineering screening
Run deterministic DC screening when an authorized current network model and required ratings are available.
- 0.4
Decision policy
Apply the evidence gate. Where required evidence is absent, the policy forces review rather than ranking.
- 0.5
Executive recommendation
Persist an append-only Decision Record with verdict, evidence coverage, risks, unknowns, and next diligence.
GridVision owns the deliverable. Management review and formal utility and engineering studies remain authoritative throughout.
Product capabilities
What is available now, what depends on evidence, and what is not built yet.
Each capability carries its own state and scope. Nothing on this page is described as live unless it is.
Available now Available now Structured project intake
Define a project or comparison in a structured intake across supported market and project fields.
No field is inferred. Unsupplied inputs remain unsupplied.
Available with required evidence Project and queue evidence
Use a verified current queue record when a supported provider returns one for the project in question.
If the record is unavailable, the analysis does not fall back to sample evidence.
Available with required evidence DCPF / PTDF / LODF screening
Deterministic DC screening over an authorized current network model with the required ratings and injections.
Not an AC, stability, short-circuit, protection, or utility study. Unavailable without an authorized snapshot.
Available with required evidence Hosting-capacity screening
Screening support within the same deterministic DC scope as the rest of the network analysis.
Scope is limited to the authorized network model supplied; it is not a utility hosting-capacity publication.
Available now Evidence lineage
Retain source, as-of time, fetch time, dataset and model versions, hashes, freshness, and transformation notes where present.
A lineage reference records provenance. It is not independent verification of the source.
Available now Decision Record
Persist an append-only, tenant-scoped record of the analysis that authorized users can reopen later.
A new analysis creates a new record. Existing records are never rewritten.
Available now Executive report export
Export an evidence-backed JSON or PDF report of the Decision Record for a management meeting.
Available to roles holding export permission. Export is audit logged.
Available with required evidence Scenario comparison
Compare options manually with explicit input references and visible source limitations.
Sample or unknown queue evidence is not decision-eligible in a comparison.
Available now In-product review and sign-off
Capture decision owner, reviewer, comments, and approval as append-only review events.
The recorded management decision remains the customer's judgment; the system only records the review.
Not available — planned Forecast provenance register
A decision-native register comparing forecast versions, assumptions, owners, conflicts, and decision impact.
Not shipped. Forecasts may be recorded as evidence inputs, but are not independently verified.
Not available — planned Decision-to-outcome tracking
Following a formal Decision Record through to its later real-world result as one chain.
Not shipped. Do not rely on closed-loop outcome tracking.
Public-data demonstration
See the evidence behind one PJM project.
Beacon Solar · AG1-553 · Cordova 345 kV
Public sources · October 7, 2026Review disposition
REVIEW
Decision basis
The project fact sheet targets Q4 2028. PJM displays January 15, 2030. The reason for that difference remains unknown.
Management action
Authenticate the current obligations and reconcile the schedule before relying on this public record.
Study basis
Phase III v1.00, September 18, 2025. Historical study estimates are kept separate from security and cash paid.
Decisive diligence
Confirm the latest agreement, cost exhibits, security ledger and approved project schedule.
Evidence trail
The five-page record links to official PJM and developer sources, with document versions and retrieval dates.
Evidence coverage
Public study, project status, facilities report and project fact sheet. No confidential inputs were supplied.
Unknowns
Current obligations, payments, authorized decision owner and a reconciled schedule remain unverified.
Read the five-page Decision Record
Public-data demonstration, not a customer case or commissioned engagement. REVIEW is a document-verification gate, not an engineering go/no-go verdict. The developer has not endorsed this record.
Public-record retrospectives
Read the queue record for yourself.
Readings of a public dataset, not customer case studies. Every row can be checked against the source.
PJM
The project that got built was filed as three separate requests.
Hatfield 500 kV
3 built · 3 withdrawn
PJM
The same pattern as Hatfield, at a different node.
Essex 230 kV
3 built · 5 withdrawn
PJM
Two identical gas requests, filed the same day. Both withdrew.
Axton 138 kV
1 built · 4 withdrawn
PJM
Everything large withdrew. Everything built was tiny and fast.
Dickerson 230 kV
2 built · 4 withdrawn
Trust and evidence
Every recommendation carries its supporting evidence.
Decision evidence across six major ISO markets—PJM, MISO, CAISO, NYISO, ISO-NE, and SPP—organized for management review. Represented project records carry source attribution, and absent source fields are shown as N/A rather than filled with invented values.
- Source attribution
- Each evidence reference carries the source it came from.
- Fetch and as-of time
- When the evidence was published and when GridVision retrieved it are both retained.
- Model and dataset version
- The network model, dataset version, and transformation notes travel with the analysis.
- Missing data remains missing
- An unavailable source field is shown as N/A. It is never filled with an inferred value.
- Sample data cannot become authoritative
- Sample or unknown evidence is not decision-eligible and cannot promote itself into a record.
- AI explains, it does not create facts
- Assistance can explain a Decision Record. It cannot generate engineering facts or supply missing evidence.
PJM Decision Sprint
One live PJM decision. Ten business days. One accountable record.
GridVision organizes the evidence behind one project and one POI before your team commits the next study or development dollar. Bring a decision due within 90 days; we return a cited GO / REVIEW / STOP Decision Record in ten business days when the required evidence is available.
This is a scoped decision-support engagement, not a utility or engineering study, investment advice, or guarantee of cost, capacity, or schedule. Founder-approved commercial terms are confirmed after the eligibility review. We reply to a submitted request within one business day.
Initial scoped sprints: USD $7,500–$15,000. Final scope and fee are agreed in a written quote. The ten-business-day clock begins when the agreed evidence packet and payment terms are satisfied.
Decisions in scope
- One active PJM project and one named POI
- Whether to continue, change POI, pause, or stop
- Whether to commit the next study or development spend
- A decision deadline within the next 90 days
What the project team provides
- One decision owner and one evidence owner
- Project, POI, queue ID, and decision deadline
- Site-control, project, permit, and study evidence
- Authorization for any network snapshot used
- Participation in the evidence and management reviews
Deliverables
- 0.1
Evidence and source-date map
- 0.2
Facts, assumptions and unknowns register
- 0.3
POI and queue risk review
- 0.4
Evidence-gap and next-diligence plan
- 0.5
GO / REVIEW / STOP Decision Record
- 0.6
One management review meeting
Where required evidence is missing, GridVision identifies the gap rather than substituting for it — an evidence-gap assessment remains a valid outcome, but an unsupported model-based conclusion is not issued. Success does not require a predetermined recommendation, model result, or commercial outcome. Formal utility determinations and engineering studies remain authoritative, and final judgment and action remain with the customer's management.
- Independent renewable developers
- Independent power producers (IPPs)
- EPC project teams
- Owner’s engineers
- PJM interconnection leads
- Development decision owners
Next step
Check one PJM project for a Decision Sprint.
Bring the project, POI, decision deadline, and evidence owner. We will first check whether the decision fits the current PJM evidence and delivery scope.
The first review is a 15-minute eligibility call. Scope is then agreed around one project, one POI, one decision, and the sources you are authorized to use.