Skip to content
← All retrospectives

PJM · Pennsylvania

The project that got built was filed as three separate requests.

Hatfield 500 kV

Six requests at one node: a retiring coal plant, one gas project assembled from three requests, and two large single-request gas projects that withdrew.

Built
3
Withdrawn
3
Still in queue
0

The queue record

Every interconnection request the dataset records at this point of interconnection, in filing order.

Interconnection requests recorded at this point of interconnection, with request date, capacity and outcome.
RequestedProjectTechnologyCapacityOutcome
2014-10-06Hatfield Ferry, Units 1, 2, and 3Coal1710 MWWithdrawn2016-11-23
2015-04-30Hilltop Energy Center FacilityGas515 MWBuilt2021-04-01 · 5.9 yrs
2015-10-27Hilltop Energy Center FacilityGas20 MWBuilt2021-04-01 · 5.4 yrs
2016-10-21Renaissance Energy CenterGas1140 MWWithdrawn2019-11-11
2017-01-25(unnamed)Gas1140 MWWithdrawn2017-03-28
2017-03-28Hilltop Energy Center FacilityGas129.7 MWBuilt2021-04-01 · 4.0 yrs

What the record shows

  • Hilltop Energy Center appears three times in the queue — 515 MW, 20 MW and 130 MW — filed across 2015 to 2017, and all three reached commercial operation on the same day, 2021-04-01.
  • The two largest single requests at this node, both 1,140 MW gas, withdrew. One lasted three years; the other was withdrawn about two months after filing.
  • Total capacity that reached commercial operation at this node — 665 MW across three requests — is less than either of the withdrawn 1,140 MW requests.
  • The retiring Hatfield Ferry coal units, at 1,710 MW, were withdrawn from the queue in 2016.

What a decision record would have to make explicit

  • A comparison at this node in 2016 would have been between an incremental multi-request approach and a single large request. The record shows which reached operation, not why.
  • Capacity was not a proxy for likelihood of reaching operation at this node.
  • Withdrawal reasons, study costs and upgrade assignments are not in the public queue record, so they remain unknowns.

What this does and does not show

This is a reading of a public dataset, not a customer case study: no engagement, customer or client is involved. The dataset records outcomes — what was built, what withdrew, and when — but not why any project withdrew, so no cause is attributed here. Nothing on this page claims GridVision predicted, influenced or would have changed any outcome, and a pattern at one point of interconnection does not generalise to another.

Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up: 2026 Edition — project-level interconnection queue dataset. Interconnection requests through year-end 2025. Used under CC BY 4.0; attribution to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and GridTracker.