Skip to content
GridVision AI

PJM · Ohio · Public-record retrospective

Marysville-Flatlick 765 kV: interconnection queue history

Three of nine requests withdrew; six are still in the queue.

GridVision AI ResearchUpdated

Nine interconnection requests since 2016: 3 withdrew and 6 remain active.

Built
0
Withdrawn
3
Still in queue
6

The queue record

Every interconnection request the dataset records at this point of interconnection, in filing order.

Interconnection requests recorded at this point of interconnection, with request date, capacity and outcome.
RequestedProjectTechnologyCapacityOutcome
2016-04-12(unnamed)Gas1200 MWWithdrawn2016-10-04
2016-10-20(unnamed)Gas1277 MWWithdrawn2017-02-23
2020-08-31Oak Run Solar ProjectSolar400 MWStill in queue
2020-08-31Oak Run Solar ProjectSolar400 MWStill in queue
2021-01-29(unnamed)Solar400 MWWithdrawn2024-12-18
2023-03-02(unnamed)Solar83.5 MWStill in queue
2023-03-02(unnamed)Solar100 MWStill in queue
2023-03-02(unnamed)Solar100 MWStill in queue
2025-03-01(unnamed)Solar200 MWStill in queue

What the record shows

  • 2,877 MW of the 4,160 MW filed here withdrew.
  • The largest request filed here, 1,277 MW (gas), withdrew 0.3 years after filing.
  • Three requests were filed on 2023-03-02; all of them remain active.
  • Two of the 3 withdrawals came within a year of filing.
  • By technology, the requests here were solar 7, gas 2.
  • The longest-standing active request here was filed on 2020-08-31.
  • The dataset records this point of interconnection under two spellings, which are combined here.

What a decision record would have to make explicit

  • None of the resolved requests at this node reached operation, and the public record does not say why.
  • Six requests are unresolved, so the outcome counts at this node can still change.
  • The dataset records outcomes and dates, not reasons, so no cause is attributed to any outcome here.

What this does and does not show

This is a reading of a public dataset, not a customer case study: no engagement, customer or client is involved. The dataset records outcomes — what was built, what withdrew, and when — but not why any project withdrew, so no cause is attributed here. Nothing on this page claims GridVision predicted, influenced or would have changed any outcome, and a pattern at one point of interconnection does not generalise to another.

Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up: 2026 Edition — project-level interconnection queue dataset. Interconnection requests through year-end 2025. Used under CC BY 4.0; attribution to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and GridTracker.

Related points of interconnection

How the PJM process works today: PJM interconnection queue. Comparing candidate nodes for a project? Read how to choose a point of interconnection.

Bring One Live DecisionOther retrospectives