Skip to content
GridVision AI

PJM · Ohio · Public-record retrospective

Marysville-Sorenson 765 kV: interconnection queue history

Seven of nine requests withdrew; two are still in the queue.

GridVision AI ResearchUpdated

Nine interconnection requests since 2017: 7 withdrew and 2 remain active.

Built
0
Withdrawn
7
Still in queue
2

The queue record

Every interconnection request the dataset records at this point of interconnection, in filing order.

Interconnection requests recorded at this point of interconnection, with request date, capacity and outcome.
RequestedProjectTechnologyCapacityOutcome
2017-03-10(unnamed)Wind500.25 MWWithdrawn2019-11-07
2020-03-06Grange SolarSolar500 MWWithdrawn2025-02-27
2020-04-20Grange SolarBattery200 MWWithdrawn2025-02-12
2020-04-20Grange SolarSolar + battery400 MWWithdrawn2025-02-12
2020-10-16(unnamed)Solar200 MWWithdrawn2024-12-18
2021-09-01(unnamed)Solar55 MWWithdrawn2024-12-18
2021-10-07(unnamed)Solar100 MWStill in queue
2022-03-01(unnamed)Solar + battery119 MWWithdrawn2023-07-07
2023-02-27(unnamed)Solar271 MWStill in queue

What the record shows

  • 1,974 MW of the 2,345 MW filed here withdrew.
  • The largest request filed here, 500 MW (wind), withdrew 2.7 years after filing.
  • Two requests were filed on 2020-04-20; all of them withdrew.
  • None of the 7 withdrawals came within a year of filing; the quickest took 1.3 years.
  • By technology, the requests here were solar 5, solar + battery 2, battery 1, wind 1.
  • The longest-standing active request here was filed on 2021-10-07.
  • The dataset records this point of interconnection under three spellings, which are combined here.

What a decision record would have to make explicit

  • None of the resolved requests at this node reached operation, and the public record does not say why.
  • Two requests are unresolved, so the outcome counts at this node can still change.
  • The dataset records outcomes and dates, not reasons, so no cause is attributed to any outcome here.

What this does and does not show

This is a reading of a public dataset, not a customer case study: no engagement, customer or client is involved. The dataset records outcomes — what was built, what withdrew, and when — but not why any project withdrew, so no cause is attributed here. Nothing on this page claims GridVision predicted, influenced or would have changed any outcome, and a pattern at one point of interconnection does not generalise to another.

Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up: 2026 Edition — project-level interconnection queue dataset. Interconnection requests through year-end 2025. Used under CC BY 4.0; attribution to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and GridTracker.

Related points of interconnection

How the PJM process works today: PJM interconnection queue. Comparing candidate nodes for a project? Read how to choose a point of interconnection.

Bring One Live DecisionOther retrospectives