Skip to content
← All retrospectives

CAISO · California

1,144 MW filed. 20 MW built.

Gates Substation 230 kV

Seven requests, six withdrawals: the only project to reach operation is the smallest ever filed here, and it took 9.4 years.

Built
1
Withdrawn
6
Still in queue
0

The queue record

Every interconnection request the dataset records at this point of interconnection, in filing order.

Interconnection requests recorded at this point of interconnection, with request date, capacity and outcome.
RequestedProjectTechnologyCapacityOutcome
2014-04-30BLACKBRIARBattery20 MWBuilt2023-09-15 · 9.4 yrs
2014-04-30STONECROPSolar20 MWWithdrawn2016-09-19
2018-04-16SAGEBERRY SOLARSolar + battery311.885 MWWithdrawn2019-03-06
2019-04-15POPPYSolar184.5 MWWithdrawn2020-04-22
2019-04-15ASH TREE HYBRID SOLARSolar + battery202.877 MWWithdrawn2019-07-09
2019-04-15DRY GRAPE HYBRID SOLARSolar + battery202.76 MWWithdrawn2019-07-09
2020-04-15COMAL FLATS 1Solar + battery202.5 MWWithdrawn2021-03-30

What the record shows

  • Six of the seven requests at this node withdrew, and 1,124 MW of the 1,144 MW filed here never reached operation.
  • The one project that was built, a 20 MW battery, is tied for the smallest request at the node and took 9.4 years.
  • ASH TREE and DRY GRAPE, at 202.877 MW and 202.76 MW, were filed on the same day and withdrew on the same day, less than three months later.
  • Four separate hybrid solar-plus-battery requests of roughly 200 to 310 MW were filed between 2018 and 2020. All four withdrew.
  • No request at this node remains active, so its record is settled.

What a decision record would have to make explicit

  • This is the highest withdrawal share of any node in this set. A node where six of seven requests withdrew is a fact about the record here, not a rate that transfers elsewhere.
  • Two near-identical capacities filed and withdrawn on the same days point to one decision across two requests, but the dataset records no project grouping.
  • The dataset gives no reason for any of the six withdrawals.

What this does and does not show

This is a reading of a public dataset, not a customer case study: no engagement, customer or client is involved. The dataset records outcomes — what was built, what withdrew, and when — but not why any project withdrew, so no cause is attributed here. Nothing on this page claims GridVision predicted, influenced or would have changed any outcome, and a pattern at one point of interconnection does not generalise to another.

Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up: 2026 Edition — project-level interconnection queue dataset. Interconnection requests through year-end 2025. Used under CC BY 4.0; attribution to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and GridTracker.