CAISO · Nevada · Public-record retrospective
Control Substation 115 kV bus: interconnection queue history
Fourteen requests and 1,091 MW filed. None built.
GridVision AI ResearchUpdated
Fourteen interconnection requests since 2005: 14 withdrew.
- Built
- 0
- Withdrawn
- 14
- Still in queue
- 0
The queue record
Every interconnection request the dataset records at this point of interconnection, in filing order.
| Requested | Project | Technology | Capacity | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-02-22 | GREEN BORDERS GEOTHERMAL | Geothermal | 62 MW | Withdrawn2013-10-11 |
| 2008-05-29 | DIXIE MEADOWS #1 | Geothermal | 60.7 MW | Withdrawn2011-02-08 |
| 2008-05-29 | NYC #1 | Geothermal | 60.7 MW | Withdrawn2011-02-08 |
| 2008-05-29 | TGDV #1 | Geothermal | 60.7 MW | Withdrawn2011-02-08 |
| 2008-05-29 | TGDV#2 | Geothermal | 60.7 MW | Withdrawn2011-03-23 |
| 2010-07-31 | TERRA GEN DIXIE VALLEY EXPANSION | Geothermal | 5.6 MW | Withdrawn2011-07-28 |
| 2010-07-31 | TGP NNP | Geothermal | 364.2 MW | Withdrawn2011-06-27 |
| 2011-03-31 | DEADHORSE WELLS GEOTHERMAL PROJECT | Geothermal | 27 MW | Withdrawn2012-03-28 |
| 2011-03-31 | DIXIE-COMSTOCK GEOTHERMAL PROJECT | Geothermal | 38 MW | Withdrawn2013-05-03 |
| 2011-03-31 | EDWARDS CREEK GEOTHERMAL PROJECT | Geothermal | 38 MW | Withdrawn2012-03-28 |
| 2011-03-31 | TUNGSTEN MOUNTAIN GEOTHERMAL PROJECT | Geothermal | 38 MW | Withdrawn2012-03-26 |
| 2011-03-31 | COYOTE CANYON | Geothermal | 70 MW | Withdrawn2012-03-06 |
| 2014-03-28 | DIXIE VALLEY 2 | Geothermal | 5 MW | Withdrawn2014-10-15 |
| 2021-04-15 | PEARL GEOTHERMAL | Geothermal | 200 MW | Withdrawn2023-01-09 |
What the record shows
- 1,091 MW of the 1,091 MW filed here withdrew.
- The largest request filed here, 364 MW (geothermal), withdrew 0.9 years after filing.
- Five requests were filed on 2011-03-31; all of them withdrew.
- Seven of the 14 withdrawals came within a year of filing.
- The dataset records this point of interconnection under eight spellings, which are combined here.
What a decision record would have to make explicit
- Every request at this node withdrew. The public record does not say why, so a new request here would have to rest on its own study evidence rather than on this history.
- The dataset records outcomes and dates, not reasons, so no cause is attributed to any outcome here.
What this does and does not show
This is a reading of a public dataset, not a customer case study: no engagement, customer or client is involved. The dataset records outcomes — what was built, what withdrew, and when — but not why any project withdrew, so no cause is attributed here. Nothing on this page claims GridVision predicted, influenced or would have changed any outcome, and a pattern at one point of interconnection does not generalise to another.
Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up: 2026 Edition — project-level interconnection queue dataset. Interconnection requests through year-end 2025. Used under CC BY 4.0; attribution to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and GridTracker.
Related points of interconnection
- CAISO · CaliforniaColorado River Substation 230 kV16 requests · 3 built · 11 withdrawn · 2 still in queueRead the record
- CAISO · CaliforniaWindhub Substation 230 kV16 requests · 3 built · 8 withdrawn · 5 still in queueRead the record
- CAISO · ArizonaHoodoo Wash Switchyard 500 kV13 requests · 2 built · 5 withdrawn · 6 still in queueRead the record
- CAISO · CaliforniaWhirlwind Substation 230 kV23 requests · 6 built · 10 withdrawn · 7 still in queueRead the record
How the CAISO process works today: CAISO interconnection queue. Comparing candidate nodes for a project? Read how to choose a point of interconnection.
