Skip to content

CAISO · California · Public-record retrospective

Boulevard East Substation 138 kV: interconnection queue history

Seven of nine requests withdrew; two are still in the queue.

GridVision AI ResearchUpdated

Nine interconnection requests since 2004: 7 withdrew and 2 remain active.

Built
0
Withdrawn
7
Still in queue
2

The queue record

Every interconnection request the dataset records at this point of interconnection, in filing order.

Interconnection requests recorded at this point of interconnection, with request date, capacity and outcome.
RequestedProjectTechnologyCapacityOutcome
2004-05-24TULE WINDWind + battery127.6 MWStill in queue
2006-06-06TECATE HYBRIDSolar + battery50 MWWithdrawn2019-12-04
2010-02-01MANZANITA WINDWind57.5 MWWithdrawn2015-11-23
2011-03-31TIERRA DEL SOL SOLAR FARMSolar45 MWWithdrawn2015-02-19
2012-04-02TIERRA DEL SOL IISolar15 MWWithdrawn2015-02-19
2012-04-02LOS ROBLESSolar100 MWWithdrawn2013-03-25
2014-04-30SLW (FKA SHU'LUUK WIND)Wind160 MWWithdrawn2015-04-01
2021-04-15DESERT JEWEL STORAGEBattery206.31 MWStill in queue
2023-04-17BoulevardierBattery199 MWWithdrawn2024-12-02

What the record shows

  • 626 MW of the 960 MW filed here withdrew.
  • The largest request filed here, 206 MW (battery), was filed in 2021 and is still active.
  • Two requests were filed on 2012-04-02; all of them withdrew.
  • Two of the 7 withdrawals came within a year of filing.
  • By technology, the requests here were solar 3, battery 2, wind 2, solar + battery 1, wind + battery 1.
  • The longest-standing active request here was filed on 2004-05-24.
  • The dataset records this point of interconnection under three spellings, which are combined here.

What a decision record would have to make explicit

  • None of the resolved requests at this node reached operation, and the public record does not say why.
  • Two requests are unresolved, so the outcome counts at this node can still change.
  • The dataset records outcomes and dates, not reasons, so no cause is attributed to any outcome here.

What this does and does not show

This is a reading of a public dataset, not a customer case study: no engagement, customer or client is involved. The dataset records outcomes — what was built, what withdrew, and when — but not why any project withdrew, so no cause is attributed here. Nothing on this page claims GridVision predicted, influenced or would have changed any outcome, and a pattern at one point of interconnection does not generalise to another.

Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up: 2026 Edition — project-level interconnection queue dataset. Interconnection requests through year-end 2025. Used under CC BY 4.0; attribution to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and GridTracker.