Skip to content
GridVision AI

CAISO · California · Public-record retrospective

Antelope 230 kV: interconnection queue history

Five of nine requests withdrew; four are still in the queue.

GridVision AI ResearchUpdated

Nine interconnection requests since 2010: 5 withdrew and 4 remain active.

Built
0
Withdrawn
5
Still in queue
4

The queue record

Every interconnection request the dataset records at this point of interconnection, in filing order.

Interconnection requests recorded at this point of interconnection, with request date, capacity and outcome.
RequestedProjectTechnologyCapacityOutcome
2010-07-31BLUE SKY WIND ENERGY CENTERWind200.1 MWWithdrawn2013-05-03
2011-03-31BIG SKY SOLARSolar + battery320 MWStill in queue
2017-05-01BLUE MOUNTAIN WINDWind108 MWWithdrawn2018-04-20
2021-04-15DORIAN STORAGEBattery213.5926 MWStill in queue
2021-04-15J90 ENERGY STORAGEBattery261 MWStill in queue
2023-04-17Pascal Energy StorageBattery2.708515 MWWithdrawn2024-12-02
2023-04-17Drifter Energy Storage 2Battery102.15 MWWithdrawn2024-12-02
2023-04-17Elion Energy Storage 2Battery102.15 MWWithdrawn2024-12-02
2023-04-17Brundage Energy StorageBattery202.2668 MWStill in queue

What the record shows

  • 515 MW of the 1,512 MW filed here withdrew.
  • The largest request filed here, 320 MW (solar + battery), was filed in 2011 and is still active.
  • Four requests were filed on 2023-04-17; 3 withdrew and 1 remains active.
  • One of the 5 withdrawals came within a year of filing.
  • By technology, the requests here were battery 6, wind 2, solar + battery 1.
  • The longest-standing active request here was filed on 2011-03-31.
  • The dataset records this point of interconnection under five spellings, which are combined here.

What a decision record would have to make explicit

  • None of the resolved requests at this node reached operation, and the public record does not say why.
  • Four requests are unresolved, so the outcome counts at this node can still change.
  • The dataset records outcomes and dates, not reasons, so no cause is attributed to any outcome here.

What this does and does not show

This is a reading of a public dataset, not a customer case study: no engagement, customer or client is involved. The dataset records outcomes — what was built, what withdrew, and when — but not why any project withdrew, so no cause is attributed here. Nothing on this page claims GridVision predicted, influenced or would have changed any outcome, and a pattern at one point of interconnection does not generalise to another.

Source: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up: 2026 Edition — project-level interconnection queue dataset. Interconnection requests through year-end 2025. Used under CC BY 4.0; attribution to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and GridTracker.

Related points of interconnection

How the CAISO process works today: CAISO interconnection queue. Comparing candidate nodes for a project? Read how to choose a point of interconnection.

Bring One Live DecisionOther retrospectives